<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What would Bakhtin do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/2008/09/01/what-would-bakhtin-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/2008/09/01/what-would-bakhtin-do/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 22:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Beard</title>
		<link>http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/2008/09/01/what-would-bakhtin-do/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>David Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetoricalcommons.org/harlot/?p=186#comment-71</guid>
		<description>The Bakhtinian rogue or carnivalesque should probably be tempered by the Foucaultian parrhesiaste and Julien Benda&#039;s intellectual.

The parrhesiaste is the figure in classical culture who speaks truth to power, fearlessly.

Benda&#039;s intellectual speaks the truth even at risk of political, personal and professional consequences -- at risk, even, Benda says, of being burned at the stake.

There is trouble in &quot;truth&quot; in these writers -- neither is referring to some ideal truth that we, in our post-post condition, know to be impossible.  So don&#039;t let that turn you away.  Instead focus on the bravery of the act in the face of consequences.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bakhtinian rogue or carnivalesque should probably be tempered by the Foucaultian parrhesiaste and Julien Benda&#8217;s intellectual.</p>
<p>The parrhesiaste is the figure in classical culture who speaks truth to power, fearlessly.</p>
<p>Benda&#8217;s intellectual speaks the truth even at risk of political, personal and professional consequences &#8212; at risk, even, Benda says, of being burned at the stake.</p>
<p>There is trouble in &#8220;truth&#8221; in these writers &#8212; neither is referring to some ideal truth that we, in our post-post condition, know to be impossible.  So don&#8217;t let that turn you away.  Instead focus on the bravery of the act in the face of consequences.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/2008/09/01/what-would-bakhtin-do/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetoricalcommons.org/harlot/?p=186#comment-72</guid>
		<description>P.S. Oh, yeah -- and how do we acknowledge and negotiate the position of power of &quot;scholars&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. Oh, yeah &#8212; and how do we acknowledge and negotiate the position of power of &#8220;scholars&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

