<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email the Prez-(Elect)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/2008/11/14/email-the-prez-elect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/2008/11/14/email-the-prez-elect/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 22:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vera</title>
		<link>http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/2008/11/14/email-the-prez-elect/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Vera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/?p=423#comment-166</guid>
		<description>So much for emailing the President:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/us/politics/16blackberry.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin

What a fascinating predicament. Somehow this issue never occurred to me -- that every bit of correspondence from the President must be sent securely and that the technology (apparently) doesn&#039;t yet exist to make that communication possible. It really brings into question how communication among top officials across the globe is going to happen in a digital world when the skills of hackers always rival the best security systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for emailing the President:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/us/politics/16blackberry.html?_r=2&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/us/politics/16blackberry.html?_r=2&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin</a></p>
<p>What a fascinating predicament. Somehow this issue never occurred to me &#8212; that every bit of correspondence from the President must be sent securely and that the technology (apparently) doesn&#8217;t yet exist to make that communication possible. It really brings into question how communication among top officials across the globe is going to happen in a digital world when the skills of hackers always rival the best security systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Herald</title>
		<link>http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/2008/11/14/email-the-prez-elect/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harlotofthearts.org/blog/?p=423#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I saw that site a few days ago, and was startled by the innovation that Obama and his team have used in this period.  They aren&#039;t taking a break - but are utilizing the incredible momentum from the campaign and giving it a medium that&#039;ll transform into a new type of interaction between the public and the government.

Obama just announced the use of youtube to deliver weekly fireside chats; much like FDR used the radio to address the nation throughout the depression (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/11/14/the_youtube_presidency.html).  There will also be interactive web interviews with various members of the administrator, as well as talk to engage congress and state representatives in a similar manner.

Whatever people&#039;s stance on Obama, they have to admit his initiatives with technology and the government are brilliant.  It was how he organized his campaign to communicate to his supporters, and it&#039;ll obviously be how he continues this into the presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that site a few days ago, and was startled by the innovation that Obama and his team have used in this period.  They aren&#8217;t taking a break &#8211; but are utilizing the incredible momentum from the campaign and giving it a medium that&#8217;ll transform into a new type of interaction between the public and the government.</p>
<p>Obama just announced the use of youtube to deliver weekly fireside chats; much like FDR used the radio to address the nation throughout the depression (<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/11/14/the_youtube_presidency.html" rel="nofollow">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/11/14/the_youtube_presidency.html</a>).  There will also be interactive web interviews with various members of the administrator, as well as talk to engage congress and state representatives in a similar manner.</p>
<p>Whatever people&#8217;s stance on Obama, they have to admit his initiatives with technology and the government are brilliant.  It was how he organized his campaign to communicate to his supporters, and it&#8217;ll obviously be how he continues this into the presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

