Public vs. Private

Shocking! According to an Associated Press article, “Israeli newspaper publishes Obama’s private prayer,” a prayer Obama reportedly left at Jerusalem’s Western Wall has been published in an Israeli newspaper.

Sure, we often shake our heads and say “nothing’s sacred anymore,” but I’m honestly surprised at this newspaper’s decision – and at the student of religion who retrieved it in the first place. Although the prayer is not confirmed as having belonged to Obama, the penmanship seems to match his hand from a note written earlier this week.

I’m a bit torn about writing on this story. Since the text of the prayer has been offered for public consumption, I can’t help but read it as a rhetorical artifact. And yet as I was writing a line-by-line analysis of the prayer, I slowly began to realize I was becoming more and more uncomfortable with my actions. The act of writing this post and giving the story more attention makes me complicit in publicizing an issue that should be ignored out of respect for an individual who just happens to be running for president, but my act of analyzing it would be even worse: It’s beyond the acts of, say, staring and shaking my head at celebrity gossip rags while standing in line at the grocery store and more like actually buying them. I hope my restraint here is adequate.

So I’ll skip the analysis and pose questions instead, which are based on my assumption that most people will believe Obama wrote the prayer: What will religious and non-religious people in the U.S. and abroad think of the prayer’s emphasis on the personal and familial for a person who hopes to oversee the wellbeing of an entire country and by extension other countries of the world as well? Does it help him that the whole world sees him asking for wisdom and for aid in remaining strong in the face of “pride and despair?” Or do such requests make him appear weak? What do they think of him asking to be an “instrument” in a time when many acts – both good and horrific – are performed in the name of religion?

I also wonder – again, assuming Obama is the author – how much of the prayer would have been composed with a larger readership in mind. I know it’s bad of me to ask such a question, but can a person in Obama’s position compose anything private and assume it will actually remain so?

Presidential Race . . . and Alcohol

If I didn’t see this story with my own eyes, I’d believe it came out of The Onion, but sometimes we actually manage to recognize ridiculousness in real life without the help of satire: CNN has a head start on predicting our 44th President.

According to the logic behind a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll, “a voter’s drinking preferences may also reveal their political preferences.” Check out the short article for more details.

On a side note, I’m surprised CNN dismantled the comments feature for this story. I had loaded the page earlier in the day, and the comments at the top of the page were humorously negative. I refreshed the page just now, and they’ve all disappeared (before I actually read all of them. Darn). I guess CNN got the point.

“The Rhetoric Beat”

There are “aspects of our present political and cultural reality that underline the need for a prominent, persistent, and intellectually honest airing of our linguistic dirty laundry,” writes Brent Cummingham in this article, “The Rhetoric Beat.” He argues we need more public discussion of the language that frames our national discussions and savvy rhetoricians to parse apart the dominant discourse on such topics as war, climate change, and education. People must become more “aware of how the seemingly benign words and phrases they encounter daily are often finely calibrated to influence how they think about ideas.”

He says the best chance we have for this to happen is the major media outlets. Bah. I don’t see FOX news establishing a “De-Spin Rhetoric Zone” anytime soon.

The best chance we have for this are all the dedicated folk driving a project like Harlot.

(Also, why limit ourselves to just our “linguistic” dirty laundry?)

the naked spoof

A freaked-out friend just told me about the latest Radar magazine cover:

http://www.radarmagazine.com/

Scroll all the way down to see the front cover of this issue, which
features a photoshopped nude tableau of presidential candidates Rudy Giuliani, Barack Obama, and Hilary Rodham Clinton; the full shot on the fold-out cover includes Mitt Romney (in old-style men’s underwear) seated on a stool.

Radar has revised this earlier Vanity Fair cover:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11216869/

Click on the “launch” button under the photo to see the full shot. The scoop on
the Vanity Fair cover was that Rachel McAdams backed out of the
shoot when she learned it was nude, and so designer (and guest
art director of the issue) Tom Ford stepped in…

I’m thinking these texts would make for some fascinating
conversations about gender, race, sexuality, and power….as you’ll
see!

How advertisers break it down

Having spent several years working in advertising, I can no longer simply watch t.v. or flip through a magazine.

I now know that everything—from casting to level of retouching to the color of shovel a child is holding in a shot—is a belabored choice (by the way, did anyone else notice the beautiful lighting in the opening sequence of the new Harry Potter film?).

Will it soon be this way for all of us? Check out this Slate article about creative director Donald Gunn and his twelve kinds of ads, circa 1978. With his guidelines for categorizing commercials, perhaps Gunn was a better ad-man than we think.